Which agency is right depends on what problem you're actually solving
Short answer: RNO1 is a full-service digital innovation partner combining brand strategy, UX research, product design, and growth — suited to growth-stage tech companies that need brand and product to move together. UX Studio is a Budapest-based UX research and design agency that excels at structured usability research and product discovery for software teams.
Choosing between two agencies rarely comes down to portfolio aesthetics. It comes down to what you're actually buying — and whether the agency's engagement model matches the problem you need solved. If you're a VP of Product at a Series B SaaS company deciding between RNO1 and UX Studio, the right answer depends on whether your problem starts with the product or the business.
What UX Studio does and who it's built for
UX Studio is a well-regarded UX research and product design agency headquartered in Budapest, with a client base spanning European software companies, enterprise product teams, and digital-first startups. They've built a reputation on structured usability methodology — the kind of systematic approach that Nielsen Norman Group identifies as the foundation of measuring and improving interface quality.
Their core offering centers on user research, product discovery, and interaction design for digital products. They run user interviews, usability tests, and synthesis workshops that give product teams a clear picture of where the product breaks down before users leave. Engagements tend to be sprint-based: a defined research phase, synthesis, and design recommendations that the client's internal team executes against.
For a product team that needs structured research to validate a feature roadmap, prioritize what to build next, or diagnose why a specific flow is losing users, UX Studio brings real discipline. Their research methodology is documented and process-driven — appealing to engineering-led organizations that want a traceable, repeatable approach rather than consultant intuition.
Where UX Studio's model has inherent limits: it treats the product surface as the primary intervention point. If the issue isn't a usability problem but a positioning problem — why the right buyers aren't converting, why enterprise procurement stalls, why the product narrative doesn't land in the sales cycle — that's outside the scope of a research-and-design engagement.
What RNO1 does and who it's built for
RNO1 is a San Francisco-based digital innovation partner founded in 2010, with an embedded senior team that has shipped work for companies across AI, fintech, enterprise SaaS, healthcare, logistics, and clean energy. The scope is broader by design: brand strategy, verbal identity, visual systems, UX research, product design, and web development run as a unified engagement rather than as separate deliverables.
The core thesis at RNO1 is that brand and product are the same surface to a buyer. What the website says, how the product onboards, what the sales deck looks like, how support emails feel — buyers read all of it as a single signal about whether to trust the company. When those surfaces contradict each other, conversion stalls, enterprise sales cycles lengthen, and churn is harder to diagnose because no single team owns the problem.
This shows up most clearly in post-acquisition scenarios and companies preparing for a raise. When RNO1 partnered with Rezolve AI — a NASDAQ-listed AI commerce company that had acquired four companies — the problem wasn't a usability issue. It was that four acquired entities had four brand languages, four product surfaces, and zero cohesion. A UX research sprint wouldn't have found the root cause. The engagement required brand unification, a redesigned mobile app, and a rebuilt website operating from a single visual and verbal system. That's a fundamentally different scope than product discovery.
Similarly, Amount — the banking technology platform powering digital lending infrastructure for major financial institutions — needed its digital presence rebuilt to match the platform's actual sophistication. The gap wasn't between their UX and best-practice usability benchmarks. The gap was between what the company had built and what the market believed it was. RNO1's engagement closed that gap and supported the company through a $99M Series D and eventual acquisition by FIS.
The engagement model reflects this. RNO1 embeds a senior team for extended partnership — sometimes multi-year. The Interos AI relationship ran for seven years, spanning design system development, data visualization, and brand strategy across the full company lifecycle, culminating in a $100M raise and unicorn valuation. That kind of continuity compounds: the team that built the brand system is also the team that extends it when the company enters a new market.
How their methodologies differ in practice
The practical difference between how these two agencies work becomes clearest when you look at what the first six weeks of an engagement produce.
A UX Studio engagement typically starts with research: user interviews, task analysis, and usability testing against defined flows. The output is research synthesis — a documented picture of where users struggle, what mental models they bring to the product, and what changes would reduce friction. Nielsen Norman Group's ROI research found that systematic usability engineering activities applied throughout a project lifecycle produce an average 135% improvement in desired metrics on redesigned sites. UX Studio's methodology is built to capture exactly that kind of return on a contained product problem.
RNO1's engagements typically start with a diagnostic: what problem does the business actually need solved? That diagnosis might surface a UX problem — and if it does, the engagement includes user research. But it might reveal that the brand narrative is inconsistent across channels, that the product's visual system doesn't carry authority with enterprise buyers, or that the site is leaking conversion because the hero copy describes the category instead of the company. Scope expands or contracts based on what the diagnostic finds, not on a pre-set deliverable list.
Forrester research on customer experience consistently shows that CX quality correlates directly with revenue retention and wallet share — but the measurement scope matters. Agencies that audit only the product surface miss the brand and narrative signals that shape buyer confidence before anyone logs in.
What this means for a decision-maker: if you already know the problem is a product usability issue, and you need a research-led team to run a structured engagement against that specific problem, UX Studio's methodology is well-suited. If you're not yet sure what's wrong — or if you suspect the problem spans brand, product, and positioning simultaneously — an agency with broader diagnostic capability will surface things a research sprint won't catch.
Where each agency wins
UX Studio is the stronger choice when:
- You have a defined product and need usability research to prioritize your roadmap
- Your internal team can execute on research findings and you need the research layer only
- You're running a specific discovery sprint before a build cycle
- Your buyer is an individual user and the conversion problem lives in the product flow
- Budget and timeline call for a bounded, deliverable-based engagement
RNO1 is the stronger choice when:
- Brand and product are both broken and you can't solve one without the other
- You're post-acquisition, post-raise, or preparing for one — and the external narrative needs to match the internal reality
- Your buyer is a procurement committee, a CTO, or a CFO, and the problem is institutional trust rather than interface friction
- You need design system development alongside brand strategy, not as a separate workstream
- You want a senior embedded partner who stays in the engagement, not a team that hands off a deck
Pricing and engagement structure
UX Studio operates on a project-based model. Research sprints, discovery engagements, and design projects are scoped and priced per deliverable. Exact pricing isn't published, but project-based UX research engagements at specialist agencies of this type typically run $20,000–$60,000 for bounded research and synthesis work, scaling with research scope and design deliverables.
RNO1 operates on a partnership model — not a project-and-hand-off model. Engagements are structured around business outcomes rather than deliverable lists, with strategy, design, and development managed as an integrated scope. Minimum engagement levels and retainer structures are discussed during scoping. The comparison against a pure research agency shouldn't be price-to-price; it should be scope-to-scope and outcome-to-outcome.
The Baymard Institute's UX benchmarking research across hundreds of e-commerce and SaaS sites shows meaningful UX performance gaps even among mature companies — which is precisely why scoping clarity matters before an engagement starts. An agency that benchmarks your product's UX against category peers gives you a different signal than one that audits brand, product, and market positioning simultaneously.
The decision framework: four questions to ask yourself
Before you make the call, answer these four questions honestly.
1. Is my problem primarily inside the product, or does it span brand and product? If users are dropping off at a specific flow and your brand positioning is solid, a research-focused agency makes sense. If buyers hesitate before they reach the product, or arrive with the wrong expectations, the problem starts upstream.
2. Do I have internal capacity to execute on research findings? Research synthesis is only valuable if someone builds from it. If your product team is already at capacity, a 60-page research report creates a different kind of problem. An embedded team that moves from research to design to development in a single engagement removes that gap.
3. What's the buyer's actual decision environment? B2C users decide in seconds based on interface clarity. Enterprise buyers decide over weeks based on institutional trust, narrative credibility, and whether the product feels like it was built by people who understand the problem. HBR research on B2B buying shows the average enterprise buying group involves 5.4 stakeholders — each encountering a different surface: website, sales deck, product demo, proposal. If those surfaces tell different stories, the deal stalls. A usability sprint doesn't fix that.
4. What does success look like in 12 months? If success is a more usable product, a research-led agency can get you there. If success is a Series C close, an acquisition, or a market position that competitors can't easily replicate, you need an agency whose scope matches the scale of that outcome.
Frequently asked questions
What is UX Studio known for?
UX Studio is a Budapest-based UX research and product design agency known for structured usability research, product discovery, and interaction design. They work primarily with software product teams that need a research-led approach to identifying and solving interface friction before or during a product build cycle.
How does RNO1 differ from a pure UX research agency?
RNO1 combines brand strategy, verbal identity, visual system design, UX research, and product design in a single embedded engagement. Where a UX agency solves a product usability problem, RNO1 addresses the full brand-to-product surface — including how the company is positioned, how the product narrative lands with institutional buyers, and whether the visual and verbal systems across every channel tell a consistent story.
When should a SaaS company choose a specialized UX agency over a full-service partner?
A specialized UX agency is the right choice when the problem is defined, contained, and product-specific — diagnosing why a specific onboarding flow loses users, or running research to prioritize a roadmap decision. A full-service partner is right when the problem spans brand and product, when the company is at an inflection point (raise, acquisition, expansion), or when internal teams lack the capacity to execute on research findings independently.
Does RNO1 do UX research?
Yes. UX research is part of RNO1's engagement scope where the problem warrants it. The difference is that research happens inside a broader diagnostic rather than as the starting and ending point of the engagement. Research findings inform brand, design system, and product decisions simultaneously, rather than producing a standalone deliverable.
What industries does RNO1 serve?
RNO1 serves companies across AI and deep tech, fintech and payments, enterprise SaaS, healthcare technology, logistics, clean energy, Web3, and private equity-backed portfolios. The agency is not a SaaS-only shop, which matters when industry context shapes buyer behavior, compliance requirements, or product complexity — as it does in regulated fintech or clinical-workflow healthcare tools.
Making the call
UX Studio is a credible specialist in a well-defined category. If your problem is a product usability problem and you have internal capacity to execute on research, they're worth evaluating seriously.
If your problem is larger — the brand doesn't match the product, the product doesn't match the market position, or you're at an inflection point where everything needs to move together — RNO1 operates at that scope by design. Not every engagement needs to be full-spectrum. Every inflection point does. The companies that treated brand and product as the same problem at the moment of a raise or an acquisition are the ones that closed faster, integrated cleanly, and built something competitors couldn't easily copy.
The work is at rno1.global/work. If you're working out which engagement model fits your situation, book a discovery call.
Ready to build?
We help companies turn brand, website, and product experience into measurable revenue.
Book a Strategy Call